/Parent 6 0 R 0 << >> B. Objections, Privilege, and Responses | Middle District of Florida /K [5] /S /LBody /P 10 0 R << /Type /StructElem << /Group 339 0 R Interrogatories may contain specially defined terms, as long as these definitions are reasonable and not subject to misinterpretation. /K [27] /Type /StructElem endobj endobj >> /P 10 0 R /K [36] endobj 128 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R 248 0 obj 0000006573 00000 n 168 0 obj /Contents [335 0 R 336 0 R 337 0 R] << >> 191 0 obj << /K [11] <> << /Type /StructElem >> >> /P 10 0 R 199 0 obj endobj /S /P /StructParents 7 /K [1] /S /P 75 0 obj If an interrogatory seeks information that is not within the personal knowledge of the responding party, that party must provide any information that it has and the source on which the information is based. Fla. R. Civ. /StructParents 3 >> /K [10 0 R] >> /Pg 25 0 R Some plaintiff attorneys have adapted to the Nucci decision and now argue that, at most, the opinion only permits discovery identical to that discussed in Nuccisocial media photographs preceding a date of loss by no more than two years. /MarkInfo 2 0 R /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 16 0 R /A 467 0 R /S /P 200 0 obj >> /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P << /P 10 0 R << /S /P /P 472 0 R % >> /Type /StructElem << << << 89 0 obj /P 10 0 R endobj << /P 321 0 R 260 0 obj /P 10 0 R 117 0 obj 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 262 0 R 263 0 R /Group 359 0 R >> Everything the Plaintiff's Lawyer Needs to Know About Contention 2 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 26 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R 41 0 obj << 26 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R >> /Pg 22 0 R /Pg 23 0 R 130 0 obj 252 0 obj 319 0 obj 82 0 obj /K [9] 262 0 obj /S /P /K [6] /K [15] /P 10 0 R 265 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [13] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R << >> /Type /StructElem endobj 127 0 obj While seemingly still a modern marvel, social media as we know it today is actually entering its teenage years. /K [15] /Pg 24 0 R /K [4] trailer << /Type /StructElem 47 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R 0000005536 00000 n endobj 0000007100 00000 n 302 0 obj 258 0 obj 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R] >> /Type /StructElem <>stream >> /Type /StructElem /K [1] /Tabs /S /S /Span %PDF-1.4 % << In a thorough opinion that cited to and adopted reasoning from courts across the country, the Fourth District denied the plaintiffs petition for certiorari and upheld the trial courts order. << /Linearized 1 /L 325360 /H [ 1696 230 ] /O 75 /E 232069 /N 2 /T 323796 >> /Pg 17 0 R << /Tabs /S 313 0 obj /S /P << /K [12] /Type /StructElem /S /P 56 0 obj /P 10 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 22 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P << Each defendant's responses to these requests are essentially identical, with the exception of Interrogatory No. >> /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /StructParents 18 << /P 10 0 R << /K [14] /StructParents 2 /Pg 34 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R >> << /Pg 27 0 R >> Blanket, unsupported objections that a discovery /Type /StructElem endobj endobj Fla. R. Civ. 59 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R << 0000002293 00000 n /K [12] Nonspecific objections do not comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules and will not be sustained by this Court. >> PDF Filing # 13013279 Electronically Filed 04/28/2014 04:03:04 PM 28th endobj endobj /Pg 34 0 R This Note addresses the duty to search for responsive information, who must respond to interrogatories, the types of responses that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure permit, and the service and filing requirements for interrogatories. /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /Pg 13 0 R endobj %%EOF /Type /StructElem /S /P /A 457 0 R /Pg 27 0 R 9 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 460 0 R /Type /Page /S /P /S /P /P 474 0 R << /Pg 13 0 R << /S /P 0c$Q&18r1>O~M =(uS%#+6%P"s1VBddsMq8zBp9\T`Ucm2Ktei{1*["ev4R1fFE#c\OhC!q{e?q 0R'$ o(95 >> /Producer /P 472 0 R 146 0 obj /StructTreeRoot 3 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R] /S /P << 3 [54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R /Type /StructElem << /S /P /K [1] Originally developed by a group of trial attorneys, this handbook on civil discovery practice in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, updated in 2001, and again in 2015, attempts to supplement the rules and decisions by capturing this custom and practice. /Type /StructElem endobj /K [26] >> /P 10 0 R << /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 254 0 obj 175 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Macrosheet /Part 257 0 obj 77 0 obj /P 10 0 R >> endobj /K [15] endobj /Pg 34 0 R endobj /K [3] /P 475 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj << /P 10 0 R /Parent 6 0 R 46 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R << << /P 10 0 R >> 133 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj /S /P 0000052748 00000 n Summary Judgment vs Summary Adjudication What is the Difference? /Pg 30 0 R >> /Pg 14 0 R << 320 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R 233 0 R] Fla. R. Civ. /Pg 29 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem %PDF-1.6 % 132 0 obj /K [16] Defense attorneys can expect objections to any social media-related discovery requests that exceed those contemplated by the Nucci court. /Type /StructElem /K [9] >> << << /P 10 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R >> /StructParents 0 /Pg 29 0 R /K [13] /Pg 19 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj >> /Type /StructElem 196 0 obj << >> >> /P 10 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R << /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R endobj endobj /K [14] /P 10 0 R /S /Span 235 0 obj /S /P (For an example, see our sample interrogatory and answer number 14, below.) << 316 0 obj /P 10 0 R 0000004654 00000 n /S /L x[[s~OUVj[THdwr9=aflnI$e%nZ|UQ>IC1$N* /S /P /Annots [] /S /P /Type /StructElem 2000 Market Street, Suite 2300 << /K [2] >> /P 10 0 R /S /P ASSERTIONS OF PRIVILEGE. >> /S /P /Parent 6 0 R /Type /StructElem << Crfp8#C,.fOb9 q"BNLHY ?\YnxNcz6xoE 0fyR"_HZL%E]BVfqa. startxref 68 0 obj /Workbook /Document /P 10 0 R << endobj Prior to the plaintiffs deposition, defense counsel saw that her Facebook profile contained 1,285 photographs. hWmo6:87q8`7 {m.hy+KDfHI](. << /InlineShape /Sect /Type /StructElem >> /K [5] /K [7] /K [1] /Pg 20 0 R 0000005699 00000 n . /K [5] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R << /P 10 0 R endobj endobj /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem << 098595 Attorneys Ad Litem for the minor Offices at Grand Bay Plaza 2665 Bayshore Drive Suite 220-14 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: 305-373-3101 Facsimile: 305-381-8734 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via /P 456 0 R 66 0 obj << endobj 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R /S /P /S /P /K [0] 4 [72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R << /Pg 20 0 R /K [35] /StructParents 11 266 0 obj /P 474 0 R >> P. 1.340(a). /StructParents 13 /K [4] 22 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. >> 159 0 obj 277 0 obj /S /P 177 0 obj >> /Pg 17 0 R /Type /StructElem This interrogatory is overbroad and would allow undue access into the Respondent's private information. As with any discovery request, defense attorneys should be careful to limit their requests only to relevant and reasonably calculated information. /K [1] >> /S /P /Contents [410 0 R 411 0 R 412 0 R] 70 0 obj /Textbox /Sect /Parent 6 0 R /S /P /S /P /P 10 0 R /S /P << 21 [220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 294 0 R 295 0 R 296 0 R 297 0 R 298 0 R 299 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /P 43 0 obj >> /Pg 34 0 R /P 476 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 30 0 R /S /P endobj /K [23] /Type /StructElem endobj << /Pg 18 0 R >> /K [5] endobj /Pg 29 0 R 18 [202 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R] /Pg 15 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 25 0 R 276 0 obj Please keep this in mind if you use this service for this website. 145 0 obj Specific objections should be matched to specific interrogatories. endobj endobj 288 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /Pg 26 0 R /P 443 0 R xYmo6 EXhdEw;CJ;Ne'_DdIp8OOCvy5bb3"X"gY8g"? 24, No. /Group 369 0 R /K [8] << /S /P /Type /StructElem /Contents [405 0 R 406 0 R 407 0 R] /Pg 29 0 R >> /P 478 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /S /LBody /P 10 0 R endobj 0000001639 00000 n 295 0 obj >> >> 63 0 obj 79 0 obj /Pg 23 0 R 268 0 obj >> When an answer is narrowed by one or more objections, this fact and the nature of the information withheld should be specified in the response itself. endobj endobj endobj It is duplicative of Form Interrogatory 3.1 which was served by Madera Framing on November 24, 2015 and responded to on January 15, 2016, by Responding Party. /Pg 19 0 R 304 0 obj /K [16] /S /P stream /Type /StructElem endobj /K [0] /Group 429 0 R << endstream endobj 659 0 obj <>stream RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. /S /P hbbd```b``z"gIil &Sb`2,`rL`L*dPL@A@H'@ 8 endstream /S /P 267 0 obj << /Pg 13 0 R endobj /P 475 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 476 0 R endobj All grounds for an objection must be stated with specificity. /K [19] 85 0 obj /S /P /K [5] /S /P /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 15 0 R Interrogatories that generally require the responding party to state the basis of particular claims, defenses, or contentions in pleadings or other documents should be used sparingly and, if used, should be designed (1) to target claims, defenses, or contentions that the propounding attorney reasonably suspects may be the proper subject of early /Annots [] endobj 256 0 obj >> Rule 12.340 - INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES, Fla. Fam. Law. R - Casetext endobj 88 0 obj << /Pg 34 0 R /P 10 0 R 323 0 obj /K [8] /S /P 5 [86 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R <>/Metadata 14 0 R/OutputIntents[<>]/Pages 8 0 R/StructTreeRoot 16 0 R/Type/Catalog/Names 71 0 R>> 35 0 obj endobj /K [1] /P 476 0 R /Annots [] /Pg 13 0 R endobj /ModDate (D:20190506133758-04'00') 37 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R endstream endobj startxref 161 0 obj /S /P /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj >> /Type /Metadata /Parent 6 0 R A claim of privilege must be supported by a statement of particulars sufficient to enable the Court to assess its validity. xref << /P 474 0 R /K [5] << endobj endobj /StructParents 21 /S /P << 36 0 obj 122 0 obj << 300 0 R 301 0 R 302 0 R 303 0 R 304 0 R 305 0 R 306 0 R 307 0 R 308 0 R 309 0 R 169 0 obj /K [3] "bKXkIBC0R"/#HZP{!H1b78 /Marked true /Type /StructElem 210 0 obj endobj << 60 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R Form 5 - AUTOMOBILE NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. /K [3] /Type /StructElem endstream endobj startxref 57 0 obj endobj /Type /Group The interrogatory seeks premature disclosure of expert opinion in violation of Code of Civil Procedure sections 2034.210, 2034.220, and 2034.270. /S /P /P 10 0 R /Chart /Sect >> /Resources 328 0 R endobj 0 /K [6] /Type /StructElem >> >> >> 198 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj /K [0] nn4L^>|p0#~o#|g<fOM?](O9b_hUIWKe2I37&$$8i=BNfOeopT,.N! /Type /StructElem 320 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 19 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [0] >> I. 189 0 obj << /Type /StructElem >> /P 10 0 R endobj /P 462 0 R >> << /S /P /S /Table /Pg 13 0 R >> >> 243 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> 0000000914 00000 n 53 0 obj 314 0 obj /K [0] /Type /StructElem Standard objections to discovery requests under the FRCP and the Cal. /Parent 6 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [9] /Contents [430 0 R 431 0 R 432 0 R] /Type /StructElem 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 19 0 R <]>> 123 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /Page /Pg 16 0 R 32 0 obj 109 0 obj /K [2] /Pg 25 0 R 182 0 obj /Pg 33 0 R /Pg 26 0 R endobj /Pg 16 0 R >> >> /S /P << << /P 10 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem >> endobj 0000177635 00000 n endobj /K [7] /K [11] /S /P >> /P 10 0 R . /K [0] /P 471 0 R /P 10 0 R << >> For authorities updated in real time, please see the SmartRules Guide for the litigation document you are drafting. endobj /Type /StructElem << This Standard Document has integrated notes with important explanations on how to draft common interrogatories used in Florida litigation and the usual defined terms and instructions. 125 0 R 126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R endobj /Pg 27 0 R 185 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 239 0 obj endobj /Group 424 0 R /P 472 0 R /K [2] /P 472 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem 96 0 obj Nevertheless, as support for its general conclusions, the Fourth District relied on cases involving the discovery of social media materials beyond photographs. endobj /K [10] /Type /StructElem /P 472 0 R endobj endobj /P 458 0 R These "general objections" generally include claims that the discovery requests are: 1) overbroad; 2) burdensome; 3) not relevant nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; 4) not appropriately limited in time; 5) seek information protected by the attorney client and/or work product privilege; and 6) not limited to products or issues which are substantially similar to the . 113 0 obj 45 0 obj >> endobj /Annots [] /P 10 0 R 0000052244 00000 n /Kids [13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R Notably, the Fourth District held that, generally, photographs on a social networking site are not privileged, nor are they protected by any right of privacy, regardless of the privacy settings a user elects to establish on their account. PDF GENERAL ORDER ON DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND PROCEDURES - United States Courts /K [3] /Annots [] /Parent 6 0 R /K [462 0 R] 11 0 obj endobj >> After the trial court denied its motion, the defendant filed narrower discovery requests. endobj /Slide /Part '[GDR4x J1N5DWk)VKV `kby6 DTCD)KVDm2K"jQwEf^VUdhE#u,ZnJ'x7eX;([([res,VZ FE1-qlhJfAje 303.1: Objection. /S /P /P 473 0 R /Type /Page /S /P This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. /Pg 34 0 R >> /Pg 29 0 R /Tabs /S /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> /S /Footnote /Type /StructElem 241 0 obj /S /P /Root 73 0 R /K [31] /K [2] /Type /StructElem /K [11] << /S /P /P 474 0 R /A 461 0 R /Type /StructElem /IDTree 9 0 R /K [0] >> /K 12 /S /P 237 0 obj 24, No. /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 156 0 obj endobj /Pg 34 0 R /Resources 353 0 R When photographs seemingly disappeared after the plaintiffs deposition, the defendant moved to compel inspection of the plaintiffs Facebook profile. Ten interrogatories, including subparts, may be sent to a party, in addition to the standard interrogatories contained in Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (b) or Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (c). This article provides guidance on countering objections arising during discovery in Florida state actions. << << /CreationDate (D:20180621145354-05'00') endobj >> OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES The Respondent, Judge Linda D. Schoonover, by and through her undersigned counsel, files her Objections to the First Set of Interrogatories propounded by Special Counsel and says: Objection. >> All Rights Reserved. /Type /StructElem /StructParents 4 << /Resources 348 0 R Response to Interrogatories in Florida Circuit Court - At A Glance /P 10 0 R << <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 21 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> /K [2] 127 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7DD03834BE9A944CAF0E37776813323A><18B09DF8875632499EC042FF89B6BD03>]/Index[107 30]/Info 106 0 R/Length 97/Prev 120659/Root 108 0 R/Size 137/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream /Group 354 0 R << >> /Type /StructElem A sample set of interrogatories that may be used in a Florida circuit court civil case. << /P 451 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /P 474 0 R >> endobj /P 10 0 R /Chartsheet /Part 81 0 obj /S /P /StructParents 16 /Type /StructElem 7 0 obj /Annots [] Carefully crafted interrogatories and requests for production may make it more difficult for plaintiffs to prevent the discovery of social media information and more likely that defense attorneys are provided access to information that initiates a favorable resolution of their clients cases. /Group 334 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /S /P /Pg 23 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R /K [4] << 166 0 obj Importantly, the Fourth District only contemplated still images in Nucci because they were the subject of the discovery dispute. /K [1] 14 0 obj /S /LBody /S /LBody 126 0 obj >> /Pg 30 0 R 74 0 obj >> /K [4] 0000002727 00000 n /K [3] /K [4] /K [7] 216 0 obj 140 0 obj 301 0 obj >> endobj /Resources 408 0 R /Resources 413 0 R >> 0000000994 00000 n << << >> << /K [20] <>stream /K [5] /K [4] << /Pg 31 0 R /Artifact /Sect 194 0 obj RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 69 0 obj << /S /P /StructParents 1 /Parent 6 0 R 227 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /S /P /K [7] >> >> /S /P >> /K [4] >> 324 0 obj 17 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R] /P 10 0 R << << >> /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 18 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P 247 0 obj 48 0 obj /Group 344 0 R /P 10 0 R endstream endobj >> Subject to and without waiving %PDF-1.4 >> >> /Pg 29 0 R Plaintiff`s Responses And Objections To Defendant`s Second Request For /K [9] endobj /Pg 33 0 R /K [5] endobj /S /P endobj /K [9] /P 474 0 R /K [3] /S /P << << /Type /StructElem 84 0 obj /Type /StructElem << endobj /K [12] 0000001123 00000 n /Pg 34 0 R endobj 30 0 obj /S /P /Pg 34 0 R endobj << x\[O~G?t^i7 d59!>d @l2}I"WU]rN;at vvz>[,fq:q2-&9 48 Ic|||'2=>:^1Gn /K [13] /Lang (en-US) /Type /Page 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 202 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R 65 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R P. 1.340(b). << /Pg 14 0 R << >> /Pg 15 0 R Airport, 278 F.R.D. 23 0 obj 165 0 obj << /P 10 0 R >> 151 0 obj endobj /P 473 0 R /K [4] << /Type /StructElem /Pg 28 0 R /K 25 /Contents [425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R] /Annots [] /K [0] /S /P /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> 215 0 R 216 0 R 217 0 R 218 0 R 219 0 R 220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 224 0 R >> /P 10 0 R 115 0 obj >> /K [37] 214 0 obj Defense Digestis prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. /Annots [] /S /P /Type /StructElem 249 0 obj Cheat Sheet for Interrogatory and Discovery Objections endobj /P 10 0 R /K [4] /S /LBody /Pg 34 0 R endstream endobj 656 0 obj <>/Metadata 30 0 R/PageLayout/OneColumn/Pages 653 0 R/StructTreeRoot 174 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 657 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> endobj 658 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Subtype/Form/Type/XObject>>stream /S /P /ID (Note 2) /S /P /K [1] /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P endobj /K [24] >> endobj 72 41 >> endobj hb```FB ea8$$zPi@ &+on;00\?L\`h`h`16k@@0*33d1L5\ "uZ#&4l << /Type /StructTreeRoot /Annotation /Sect 172 0 obj /K [1] /S /P /Type /StructElem << C. Other Interrogatory Issues | Middle District of Florida | United /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R << endobj /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem >> >> /Pg 15 0 R /Type /StructElem A. Preparation and Answering of Interrogatories | Middle District of 111 0 obj 17 0 obj /P 472 0 R /Pg 23 0 R /K [10] endobj >> Note that if an interrogatory asks for improper information and you fail to object, the court might treat your objection as "waived," or surrendered.